'Chip & PIN technology represents a significant step forward in the fight against fraudulent use of credit cards. However, it is important that those with disabilities are not penalised because too little has been done to promote the alternatives.'

David Ruffley MP, the Shadow Minister for Welfare Reform, has today urged his constituents to safeguard their Chip & PIN card details. The deadline for people signing for transactions ended on Monday night and the introduction of the system is intended to make retail card transactions more secure.

Police are advising the public to keep their four-digit personal identification number (PIN) secure. Tips include memorising the PIN number, shredding any notifications received and not to share the number with anyone.

David has also called on the Government to further promote Chip & Sign for those with disabilities who are unable to use the new Chip & PIN system. Research by David's Shadow Cabinet colleague Jeremy Hunt, Shadow Minister for People with Disabilities, reveals that little has been done by many banks to publicise Chip and Signature cards and that shop assistants appear ignorant of their existence.

David said:

'Chip & PIN cards will make transactions more secure but it is of the utmost importance that people safeguard their PIN number.

'Simple tips include memorising the number, shredding any correspondence relating to it and shielding the keypad from view when entering the PIN.

'I am also calling on banks and the Government to do more to promote Chip & Signature cards which are available to people with disabilities who are unable to use the Chip & PIN system.

'There is also an obligation on retailers to make their staff aware of the existence of Chip & Signature cards. Such training will spare many disabled and elderly people a confrontational situation when paying for their goods.

'Chip & PIN technology represents a significant step forward in the fight against fraudulent use of credit cards. However, it is important that those with disabilities are not penalised because too little has been done to promote the alternatives.'